Home · Insights · Ethiopia

Strategic AnalysisPeace & Security

The TPLF Took Mekelle Back From Ethiopia's Army in 2021 and Held It for Five Years. On 3 October, Federal Forces Walked Back In Without a Fight.

The Tigray People's Liberation Front said on 3 October that it had 'temporarily moved out of Mekelle' to prevent further destruction of the city, as Tigray Peace Forces militia and then Ethiopian National Defence Force troops entered the regional capital and the nearby Alula Aba Nega Airport largely unopposed. It is the first time federal forces have held Mekelle since the TPLF recaptured it in June 2021, eleven days after the 'Ethiopian People's Forces Alliance for Survival' launched the offensive that reignited the north's war, and Addis Ababa's own military and civilian leadership had not issued a public statement on the recapture as of this writing.

FIKIR Institute · 5 October 2026 · 9 min read

The TPLF Took Mekelle Back From Ethiopia's Army in 2021 and Held It for Five Years. On 3 October, Federal Forces Walked Back In Without a Fight.

Audio reading is ready.

Abstract: Tigray's regional capital, Mekelle, passed from the Tigray People's Liberation Front to Ethiopian government control on 3 October, the first time the city has changed hands since the TPLF recaptured it from federal forces in June 2021. A source close to the pro-government Tigray Peace Forces militia told Reuters its fighters entered Mekelle's centre on Saturday afternoon, followed by the Ethiopian National Defence Force, which also retook the city's Alula Aba Nega Airport, one of three regional airports the TPLF had seized on 23 September at the outset of the current fighting. The TPLF's own statement did not describe a defeat: it said its forces had "temporarily moved out of Mekelle" and that the regional administration would "operate from somewhere else," a framing that treats the withdrawal as tactical and reversible rather than final, and that cited a wish to spare the city further destruction. Ethiopia's federal government has not, as of this writing, issued its own public statement confirming or characterising the recapture, an absence that leaves one half of the war's most consequential development so far undocumented by the party that benefits from it. The African Union, which has repeatedly invoked the 2 November 2022 Pretoria agreement it brokered between Addis Ababa and the TPLF, and the United States, which has already imposed visa restrictions on TPLF hardliners and warned of further sanctions, now face a battlefield fact that neither institution's prior statements anticipated: Tigray's capital is back under the nominal authority of the government the Pretoria agreement was designed to keep it at peace with, achieved not through the negotiated process either institution has called for but through the second change of control over the city in five years.

A withdrawal, not a battle

What makes Mekelle's fall distinct from the airport seizures, airstrikes and town-by-town fighting FIKIR Institute has tracked since the Ethiopian People's Forces Alliance for Survival launched its offensive on 23 September is the absence of a reported battle for the city itself. Reuters reported that a source close to the Tigray Peace Forces, the pro-government militia that has fought alongside federal troops against the TPLF, said its fighters entered Mekelle's centre on the afternoon of Saturday, 3 October, with the Ethiopian military following. A pro-government militia source, a humanitarian worker and a Mekelle resident each separately confirmed to Reuters on Sunday that the city was under federal-aligned control. France 24 and the Associated Press reported the same sequence: Tigrayan rebel forces abandoned the regional capital as pro-government forces advanced, rather than being driven out in street fighting. The Ethiopian military separately recaptured the city's Alula Aba Nega Airport, one of three regional airports, alongside Aksum and Shire, that TPLF-aligned Tigray Defence Forces had seized on 23 September in the opening move of the current round of war, a seizure that had forced Ethiopian Airlines to suspend all flights to the region.

What the TPLF said, and what it left unsaid

The TPLF's statement, posted on social media late on Saturday, said its forces had "temporarily moved out of Mekelle" and that the regional government would "operate from somewhere else," language that casts the withdrawal as a tactical repositioning rather than a military collapse. Regional reporting on the statement characterised the decision as intended to prevent further destruction in the city, implying that continuing to defend Mekelle street by street carried a civilian cost the TPLF's leadership judged not worth paying, at least for now. The statement did not say where the regional administration would relocate to, how long the "temporary" absence from Mekelle was expected to last, or whether TPLF forces intended to contest the city again. TPLF Chairman Debretsion Gebremichael, in his first television appearance since the fighting resumed on 23 September, had called the war an existential fight against Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed's government, a framing that sits uneasily next to a withdrawal from the movement's own symbolic and administrative capital; whether that existential framing survives the loss of Mekelle, even a declared temporary one, is a question the TPLF's own statement left unanswered.

The government's silence

Ethiopia's federal government has conspicuously not claimed the moment. Wire reporting noted that neither the Ethiopian National Defence Force's spokesperson nor a representative for Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed had responded to requests for comment on the recapture as of this writing, even as Tigray Peace Forces and federal troops were confirmed to be in control of the city. This is a marked departure from the government's posture following the 23 September airport seizures and the 27 September accusation by army chief Field Marshal Berhanu Jula that Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt were arming the rebel alliance, both of which Addis Ababa addressed publicly and quickly. The silence around Mekelle itself, the war's most tangible territorial result to date, is difficult to read as anything other than deliberate, whether out of caution that the TPLF's "temporary" framing may prove accurate, concern about how a triumphalist statement would read to an international audience already alarmed by the war's reopening, or simple institutional lag in a government managing a widening conflict on multiple fronts simultaneously.

Why a quiet handover is not obviously a federal victory

The Africa Report's own analysis of the recapture, citing Roland Marchal, a researcher at France's CNRS and a specialist in Africa's civil wars, argued against reading Mekelle's fall as proof that Abiy's government has reasserted control over Tigray. The opposite case, that a regional capital can change hands with so little resistance after only eight days of renewed conflict, suggests the TPLF's hold on the city was tenuous to begin with and that neither side has demonstrated it can sustain control over Tigray's territory for long. Mekelle itself is a useful illustration of that instability: federal forces held the city after capturing it in November 2020, lost it to a TPLF counteroffensive in June 2021, and have now retaken it in October 2026, a city that has changed hands three times in six years of intermittent war. A capital that can be taken without a fight can, on the same logic, be retaken without one, and the TPLF's own description of its withdrawal as temporary suggests its leadership has not ruled out trying.

A battlefield fact arriving inside an active diplomatic rupture

Mekelle's recapture lands two days after Ethiopia closed its embassy in Asmara and expelled ten Eritrean diplomats, a rupture Eritrea answered within hours by severing all remaining diplomatic ties, as FIKIR Institute reported on 3 October, and a day before Egypt hosted Eritrea's Isaias Afwerki, Sudan's Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Somalia's Hassan Sheikh Mohamud in New Alamein, a summit assembling three of the governments Ethiopia's own army chief has accused of arming the TPLF-led alliance, as this outlet covered on 4 October. Mekelle's fall therefore does not arrive in a diplomatic vacuum: it lands in the middle of Ethiopia's most isolated week on the regional stage since the war resumed, at the exact moment a battlefield result might otherwise have strengthened Addis Ababa's hand. Whether the recapture of Tigray's capital gives the Ethiopian government leverage to address the Eritrea rupture and the New Alamein alignment from a position of strength, or whether its own silence on the recapture reflects an awareness that one city is not the same as one war, is a question this week's events have not yet answered.

International reaction has not caught up to the battlefield

The African Union Commission, which has repeatedly called on Ethiopia, Eritrea and Egypt to exercise "utmost restraint" and "immediate de-escalation" since the fighting resumed, has anchored its statements in the 2 November 2022 Pretoria Agreement between Addis Ababa and the TPLF, which it has called "the cornerstone of sustainable peace, stability and reconciliation in Ethiopia." The AU's most recent statements, issued around the 23 September airport seizures, had not yet addressed a scenario in which the TPLF loses physical control of the city that agreement was meant to secure for it. The United States, whose ambassador in Addis Ababa, Ervin J. Massinga, condemned the TPLF-led offensive in late September as an "unwinnable fight" and warned of further sanctions, had already imposed visa restrictions on unnamed TPLF hardliners and their immediate families and barred U.S. government personnel from travelling to Tigray and Afar. Neither institution has yet issued a statement addressing Mekelle's recapture specifically, leaving a gap between the diplomatic language both have used, calling for restraint and a return to the Pretoria framework, and a battlefield development that has already overtaken the status quo that framework was designed to preserve.

Civilians caught between a quiet handover and an uncertain future

Residents of Mekelle, northern Ethiopia's largest city, have described fear rather than relief at the handover, according to wire reporting, with many reportedly attempting to leave for other provinces as fighting continued in surrounding areas even after the city centre itself changed hands without major combat. The TPLF's own stated rationale for withdrawing, to spare the city further destruction, implicitly acknowledges what residents already lived through in the 2020-2022 war, a conflict whose toll researchers and the African Union's own peace envoy have previously estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dead, with more than a million displaced and tens of millions requiring humanitarian assistance across the broader conflict. Humanitarian organisations operating in the region have warned that renewed fighting risks disrupting aid deliveries and exposing a population still recovering from that war to further displacement and shortages, a warning that a quiet change of control in Mekelle does nothing to resolve so long as fighting continues elsewhere in Tigray and Afar.

What to watch

Three signals will show whether Mekelle's recapture marks a turning point in the war or a pause before further fighting. First, whether Ethiopia's federal government or the ENDF issues any public statement on the recapture, and if so, whether it claims a decisive victory or acknowledges the TPLF's "temporary" framing by avoiding one. Second, whether the TPLF attempts to contest Mekelle again in the coming weeks, which would confirm Roland Marchal's reading of the withdrawal as tactical rather than terminal, or whether the movement instead consolidates around other towns and the Alliance for Survival's wider coalition with Fano, Oromo and other factions. Third, whether the African Union or the United States updates its public position to address the recapture directly, given that both institutions' prior statements were built around a status quo, TPLF control of Mekelle and its airport, that no longer holds.

Policy implications

For Ethiopia's government, retaking Mekelle without a reported battle is a tactical gain it has so far declined to claim publicly, a caution that may reflect genuine uncertainty about how durable the gain is rather than simple delay; claiming victory prematurely, only for the TPLF to make good on its "temporary" framing, would cost Addis Ababa credibility it can ill afford during a week in which three neighbouring governments have just met in Egypt without it. For the TPLF, framing the withdrawal as tactical rather than as a defeat preserves Debretsion Gebremichael's existential framing of the war, but it also commits the movement to eventually acting on that framing, whether by attempting to retake the city or by explaining why it has not. For the African Union and the United States, both now hold public positions built on calls for restraint and a return to the Pretoria framework that the battlefield has already partially overtaken; a mediation effort anchored in an agreement whose central territorial assumption, TPLF administrative control of Tigray's capital, no longer matches the facts on the ground needs to adapt its terms or risk irrelevance to the war it is trying to end. For civilians in Mekelle, the immediate absence of street fighting is a reprieve, but the TPLF's own acknowledgment that it withdrew to avoid further destruction, read against a war that has already displaced more than a million people once, is a reminder that a quiet handover is not the same as a resolved war.

Related Analysis